An extensive survey of midlevel associates reveals massive internal dissatisfaction with their employers' multi-million dollar agreements with the current US administration.
A wide-ranging survey of mid-level associates conducted by American Lawyer reveals deep rifts in renowned US law firms. Over 100 young lawyers were critical of their employers' pro bono deals or their handling of diversity issues during the current political developments. The survey took place between May and June and reached more than 3,000 participants. The results reflect a generation that is increasingly basing professional decisions on ethical considerations.
Willkie Farr & Gallagher's 100 million dollar agreement triggered particularly strong reactions. 25 of the firm's associates sharply criticized the decision of its leadership. One Bay Area attorney called the move spineless and unethical, while others questioned their professional future at the firm.
Latham & Watkins also came in for criticism following the conclusion of 125 million dollar agreements. Kirkland & Ellis, A&O Shearman, Cadwalader and Simpson Thacher concluded similar agreements. Young lawyers from Washington and New York accused their employers of double standards and announced job changes.
The survey signals a fundamental cultural change. Young lawyers are increasingly evaluating employers according to ideological criteria and accepting professional disadvantages for their convictions. For law firm management, new dilemmas arise between business interests and staff satisfaction. Talent churn could have a long-term impact on recruitment and market position.